Dillon Waugh
Hayes
English 100 – 9:10
2/6/13
Word Count: 627
Gap Year – Critique
#2
In a column in the Tampa Bay Times,
Emily Harwell promotes the consideration of a gap year between high school
graduation and college attendance for the practical and livelihood experience
to attain, gathering the testimonials of students who made the most of such
periods to back her claim, to interesting effect toward her purpose. Although
such quotes and accounts only clearly prove the obvious – that gap years can be
valuable, if not necessarily that one will be thankful for having taken one in
most cases – those testimonials are indeed insightful, from the viewpoints of
those who’ve taken much out of their gap years. It is assuming that one takes
into account the measures that they recommend that I myself see no relevant
drawbacks to a gap year – however, with the article’s construction out of
nothing but snippets of personal insights, the students’ approval and tips as
provided may be insufficient to boost faith in students’ choosing to take them
in skeptics.
The main recommendation that
strengthens the case for a gap year is one that, according to Harwell, two of
the three students quoted in the column, Gates Lucas and Corey Kimer,
explicitly make: planning for the period, just as one who plans to go straight
into college would plan for that – indeed, “Kimer approached planning his gap year as a college search, by
considering cost, his goals and the opportunities available”, Harwell relays,
and as personal, physical and psychological enrichment was his goal, he went on
to spend the year assisting on a Spanish farm and living at an Indian ashram
with an organization’s help. This is evidence through practice that there is
indeed much to be accomplished even to an essential student in a single free
year – provided they know what direction to head in once the starting gun goes
off.
It’s also in the students’ statements that address to concerns of
skeptics appear – both Lucas and third student Phy Tran allude to the initial
disapproval of their plans to take gap years among friends and family, with the
latter’s friends suggesting she had “gone wild” and the former’s parents
believing it would be “a waste” when one could attain a degree a year faster.
The refutation stands simply in the fact that they were wrong. Would it be
proof enough for one who knows nobody who has actually gone through a gap year
to know that the concerns of a handful of others whose friend or young relative
expressed interest in taking a gap year for nothing? If not, may it help to
offer suggestions as to just why those few gap years – in case they imagine
that their skepticism is based on some impression that for most a gap year is
indeed a wasted, idle year’s break from education – meant something, such as
that Lucas and Tran had drawn up and organized plans? Certain other clear
appeals in favor of gap years don’t appear at all: what of the idea that a
youth could use theirs to get a taste of life outside the school system and
schedule at age eighteen as opposed to twenty-four?
An extra bit of appreciation may also prove possible to draw from the
stay-on-your-educational-track side of the podium with the suggestion that
either along with or just after plotting the course or writing a checklist of
things to accomplish for a gap year, a student looks into college and/or
applies for a spot in one – emphasizing that the purpose of a gap year is not
to run from the scrutiny and structure of formal education, and recommending
that just in case a youth’s gap year doesn’t play out according to plan, they
know where to head and what to do once the period ends.
I think that I waffled a bit on this critique; in honesty, I was not overly impressed with the article in question. Then yet again, this may be further in retrospect than from simply writing it - Burstein and Moore's columns had clearly different emphases. By contrast, Harwell's and Burstein's may not have been identical - but then again, Harwell writes little that isn't expressed by Burstein's column.
ReplyDelete